Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2025-11-19 Origin: Site
Statement 1: STS adopts the "first break, then close" technology to achieve short-term switching
Statement 2: STS adopts the "close before break" technology to achieve uninterrupted switching
Statement 3: Why does the STS switching time still take 4-8 milliseconds if it is a "close first, then disconnect"? Today, let's unravel this technical mystery!
1.The core technique of STS switching - "close first, then break"
First on: Upon detecting a fault, immediately turn on the backup side semiconductor switch.
Overlap: Both main and backup switches are turned on simultaneously for tens of microseconds (the current never stops).
Then turn off: After the current stabilizes and transfers, turn off the main power switch
✅ Key achievement: The electrical connection is truly zero interruption, and the current channel remains unobstructed at all times.
2.Where did the total time of the entire event - "4-8 milliseconds" come from?
Although the handover action itself is seamless, a complete relay also includes:
Detected teammate abnormality (detection and judgment): 1-4ms
Continuous monitoring of voltage/frequency
Confirm that it is a real fault rather than an instantaneous disturbance (to prevent misoperation)
Calculate the optimal handover time (synchronous preparation):<1ms
Find the moment when the phase of the new and old power sources matches the best
Perform perfect handover (close first, then break):<1ms
The seamless switching process mentioned above
Accelerate to race speed (voltage stable): 1-3ms
After switching, the system stabilizes again
✅Actual total time consumption=1-4ms+<1ms+<1ms+1-3ms=4-8ms
| Description | Time | Meaning | |
| close first, then break | The physical action sequence of semiconductor switches | microsecond-level | Technical to ensure current continuity |
| 4-8ms switching time | The entire process from the occurrence of a fault to the complete stability of the system | millisecond-level | Comprehensive indicators of overall system performance |
For IT equipment: The "hold time" of server power supply is usually ≥ 20ms, and the<8ms switching time of STS is completely within the safe range, with no load perception.
Compared to ATS: Mechanical ATS inevitably generates at least tens of milliseconds of interruption due to its "first break, then close" approach, while STS's fast "switching time" results in true business continuity.
3.When is it necessary to 'break before closing'?
When performing STS equipment maintenance, the completely opposite principle of "disconnect first, then close" must be adopted: disconnect all input/output circuit breakers (isolate STS) first, and then close the maintenance bypass switch (restore load power supply). This is the golden rule of electrical safety, which is not related to the operation logic of STS, but rather to the life protection of equipment operation.